Get In Touch

This site uses cookies and similar technology to function properly and to provide the services present on it, analytical cookies (our own and third party) to understand and improve users’ browsing experience, and profiling cookies (our own and third party) to serve you advertisements in line with preferences displayed while browsing online. For further information, see our Cookie Policy . To refuse consent for some or all cookies, click here. By clicking “I agree”, you consent to the use of the aforementioned cookies.

I agree
Susie Labinjoh
Partner
Alice Hardy
Partner
Jocelyn Cockburn
Partner
Nancy Collins
Partner
Sasha Barton
Partner

Judicial review is a court proceeding in which a judge reviews the lawfulness of a decision made by a public body. In the case of military personnel, this could be challenging a decision made by the Ministry of Defence, disputing a Coroner’s verdict or challenging the actions of other organisations within the Armed Forces.

Hodge Jones & Allen Solicitors has a long-standing and successful record of challenging decisions taken by public bodies, which affect military personnel. We passionately believe that military authorities should be held to account when they fail our servicemen and women in the forces.

Our specialist expertise means we can persuade the authorities to reconsider their decisions or change course, before cases reach court. However, we have fought and won judicial reviews which have been vigorously defended by the Ministry of Defence and other bodies.

How can we help?

We explore every legal avenue to overturn unfair decisions. Recognised as a leading firm for bringing judicial reviews on behalf of military personnel. Our solicitors will help you challenge decisions, procedures or failure to act appropriately, in these instances:

  • Coroner inquest verdicts
  • Refusal by the armed forces to disclose information to an inquest
  • Breaches of human rights law
  • Refusal to make payment for injuries
  • Failure to investigate complaints, for example in relation to allegations of bullying, harassment, assault and discrimination
  • Refusal to discharge someone who has Post Traumatic Stress Disorder
  • Challenging decisions on compensation
  • Failures to prosecute or investigate crimes

If there’s a decision you want to challenge, it’s important to act quickly. There’s strict time limits for launching a judicial review, usually within three months, although in some cases the review must be brought sooner. Contact us as soon as possible so we can help.

Meet Jocelyn Cockburn

Call our specialist Military Claims solicitors today on
or request a call back.

Featured cases

Our experience of military cases ranges from high profile judicial reviews to very many less well known, but no less complex or important cases. Below are two examples of how we’ve helped:

Snatch Land Rovers

We won the right to a judicial review of the Government’s refusal to hold a Public Inquiry into the use of Snatch Land Rover vehicles in Iraq. The judicial review was brought on behalf of families who lost loved ones killed in Iraq in these inadequately armoured vehicles.

The families’ claim was troops shouldn’t have been using Snatch Land Rovers in Iraq, as they’re so poorly equipped to protect against threats, such as roadside bombs.

The Ministry of Defence subsequently recommended the families should request the Iraq Inquiry to investigate the use of Snatch Land Rovers. Following concerns raised at the Iraq Inquiry, the Government announced it would spend £100 million replacing the Snatch Land Rover with an improved armoured patrol vehicle.

Private Jason Smith

Following a lack of disclosure by the Ministry of Defence, we brought a judicial review to challenge the verdict of an inquest into the death of Private Jason Smith, who suffered a fatal heatstroke while serving in Iraq in 2003.

This resulted in the Supreme Court quashing the verdict and led to a second inquest which found that the risk of death could have been reduced by adherence to policy on heat illness, in terms of climatic monitoring, hydration and medical treatment, and by the availability of air-conditioned accommodation and vehicles.

We won substantial damages and an apology for Jason’s mother from the Ministry of Defence.

Further Reading
View all

"They are remarkably consistent, client-focused and detail-oriented." Chambers UK, 2021

    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.