Confiscation and Restraint Solicitors

“A firm dedicated to the old-fashioned virtue of conscientious hard work in pursuit of their clients’ interests”.

Legal 500 – Ranked as Tier 1 (Crime), Independent Legal Directory

Confiscation and Restraint

Both Confiscation and Restraint Proceedings are started by prosecuting authorities mainly under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA). POCA allows a prosecuting authority to apply to the Court to freeze (restrain) a person’s assets when an investigation is ongoing and the property is believed to be the benefit of criminal conduct. The purpose is to preserve assets which may be the subject of confiscation proceedings following conviction. The Order will prevent them being disposed of.

The consequences of restraint and confiscation can be far reaching – affecting not only the person accused of criminal activity, but all those with a connection to the property including family, friends and business associates

Assets can be restrained for years while the criminal investigation and proceedings resolve.  If convicted, the funds subject to confiscation can exceed the amount a person has benefitted from crime.

Request a Call Back from one of our team

Why Hodge Jones & Allen?

  • Highly Experienced

Hodge Jones & Allen Solicitors has a long history of successfully challenging Confiscation and Restraint Orders. This is a complex and technical area of law, and HJA’s specialist restraint and confiscation lawyers have the expertise to achieve the best possible outcomes.

  • Experts suited to your needs

Hodge Jones & Allen Solicitors identify issues relating to confiscation early in the criminal proceedings and have a strategic overview of your case from the start. The best way to avoid confiscation is to make sure that you are not convicted of any offence. So if faced with criminal proceedings which may end in confiscation, seek the advice of our award winning Criminal Defence Team. How your defence is conducted matters hugely in subsequent confiscation proceedings and we begin to proactively think about potential confiscation proceedings from the moment that you instruct us.

  • Lawyers who care

For decades, we have built up contacts and relationships with leading barristers, forensic accountants and business experts to ensure that if you instruct us, we will always assemble the best possible team to ensure the lowest possible confiscation order is imposed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Frequently asked questions

Will I be notified that the prosecution are going to apply for a restraint order?

Prosecuting authorities can apply for a Restraint Order against a criminal suspect or connected person – including innocent third parties – without notifying them. They usually do this at an early stage in a criminal investigation to preserve assets to meet any Confiscation Order made following conviction.

In addition to not having to notify the subject of the application for Restraint, the prosecutor needs only to have to pass a very low threshold in securing a Restraint Order. It must be shown on the balance of probabilities that the property is linked to criminal conduct and there is a risk that if the Restraint Order is not granted, the property and assets will be dissipated. An application for Restraint is usually accompanied by a witness statement from the law enforcement official setting out the reasons for the applications.

What happens if I cannot pay my Confiscation Order

If a high confiscation order is imposed and you cannot pay it, then you will face the prospect of spending more time in prison.  When the Order is made, a default sentence is set by the Judge which must be served if payment is not made. A guide to the length is set out here:

Amount unpaid:

  • £10,000 or less  – Up to 6 months*
  • More than £10,000 but no more than £500,000 – Up to 5 years*
  • More than £500,000 but no more than £1 million – Up to 7 years*
  • More than £1 million – Up to 14 years

*Maximum Term

The maximum time that a Court can grant to pay the Order is 6 months in total.  After this, interest on the unpaid amount will accrue.

What are hidden assets?

A particular cause for concern is the assertion by the prosecution in confiscation proceedings that the defendant has ‘hidden assets’. If the Court agrees, the value of that hidden asset will be considered available to pay towards the Confiscation Order. This means defendants face the difficult task of proving a negative – that they do not hold these funds or assets.

At HJA we have unrivalled experience of a wide variety confiscation proceedings in the context of high value drugs and fraud offences. This means we are very well placed to help you navigate these issues. We make sure that we identify any point that can be deployed in your favour to avoid facing the nightmare of serving additional unjustified time in prison.

Can you negotiate with prosecution authorities in relation to these proceedings?

We are experienced negotiators when it comes to confiscation proceedings. We have often secured outstanding agreements for Confiscation Orders far lower than originally applied for by the prosecution – often just a mere fraction.

This is through meticulous planning and preparation of your confiscation case, identifying and securing all possible avenues of evidence to support your case and then deploying these to negotiate the best settlement with the prosecuting authority.

Do the prosecution have to prove that these assets are from criminal activity?

Defendants are frequently alarmed to learn that the value of the Confiscation Order applied for by the prosecution exceeds their benefit from the crime they were convicted of. In stark distinction to criminal proceedings, where the burden falls on the prosecution to prove the case against a suspect beyond all reasonable doubt, this burden reserves in confiscation proceedings.

A defendant must prove they don’t have the assets that the prosecution assert they do, likewise that they have not benefited from criminal conduct by as much as the prosecution assert. It is vital to have specialist lawyers to advise you.

What happens if the prosecution are trying to confiscate an asset which does not belong to me or it is my asset and I am not party to the proceedings?

If it is not your asset, but your partners or someone else owns the asset, they can intervene in the proceedings to make sure that it does not get confiscated. We have successfully represented innocent third parties in this context to ensure that their assets are preserved and not unfairly confiscated when they have done nothing wrong.

Can the prosecution apply for confiscation of assets that have not come from the criminal activity that I have been convicted of?

Yes, the prosecution can ask the Court to consider that a convicted person has been leading a “criminal lifestyle” over and above what they have been convicted of. This can trigger what is known as “statutory assumptions” namely that any money or assets that have passed through a convicted person’s hands during the six years before the day on which the defendant was charged is the proceeds of crime.

If the Court makes this finding, that money and assets can be confiscated. That can be a terrifying prospect – to potentially lose the money and assets that you have worked hard to acquire. We have the expertise and knowledge to seek support you and present your case that to proceed in this way would be unfair.

 

View all criminal defence FAQs

Featured Client Cases

Featured Case

Partner Raj Chada is acting for a defendant in complicated confiscation proceedings arising from a Bribery and Corruption case. This involves mounting legal argument to demonstrate that certain statutory assumptions do not apply based on how the evidence at trial unfolded linked to the legal directions allowed and the interpretation of jury verdicts.

Featured Case

Partner Kiran Mehta is involved in complex confiscation proceedings by the FCA arising from the largest and most complex investigation and prosecution for insider dealing every conducted by the FCA in the UK.

Featured Case

Partner Kiran Mehta has concluded confiscation proceedings arising from very serious and organised crime concerning firearms and drugs. The case attracted enormous publicity and the prosecution sought a confiscation order, including the assertion of hidden assets in excess of half a million pounds. Further to detailed preparation and successful negotiation with the prosecution a confiscation order of just £1 was agreed.

Featured Case

Complex Confiscation Proceedings

Advising in complex confiscation proceedings taken by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) involving suggestions of hidden assets. The Order sought by the FCA is many millions of pounds more than the value of client’s benefit. Multiple third party interest in the main asset are being asserted.

How to get in touch?

  • Top Ranked Solicitors

Our top ranking team have years of experience representing the innocent. We stand up to the prosecution who will always be represented by an experienced solicitor or barrister. We know how to fight and win cases.

  • Here to help

Representing you at the Police Station or in Court If you need urgent representation call us today. Share a few details with us and we’ll let you know how we can help you.

  • Call FREE 24 hours a day

If you are calling outside our offices hours (9:30am to 5:30pm) call our free phone 24 telephone 0844 8480 222. There will always be someone at the other end of the telephone to assist you.

Request a FREE callback

Fill out this form and one of the team will get back to you:


    By ticking the following box I am giving Hodge Jones and Allen consent to process my personal data for the purpose of this enquiry.

    Full details of our privacy policy is available here

    Call us on:

    Our offices are open from Monday to Friday from 9 am to 6 pm.

    Phone:0808 231 6369
    Fax:020 7388 2106
    Address:Hodge Jones & Allen Solicitors
    180 North Gower Street
    London
    NW1 2NB
    Trustpilot