Laura is a dedicated defence solicitor and Crown Court advocate who thrives on the legal and strategic challenge involved in preparing cases for trial. She fights on behalf of her clients to avoid prosecution wherever possible, whether by challenging the evidential basis of an investigation or prosecution or by challenging a decision that prosecution is in the public interest.
No case should be dismissed as small or insignificant. The consequences of coming into contact with the criminal justice system can be huge even when the charges are not deemed to be serious. Having had a diverse caseload over the years, covering everything from minor offences to the most serious, Laura has developed a diverse skill set and become a better lawyer.
It is easy for people to get lost among the power struggle between the police, the prosecution and the defence. Laura focuses on preparation and communication, being honest and clear with her clients about their options. She prides herself in taking the time to make sure that her clients understand the process they are moving through and ensuring that they can retain a feeling of control in what can be chaotic and intimidating proceedings. This is especially important for people who are vulnerable by virtue of their age or health.
Laura has a particular interest in representing children and young adults and defendants with complex psychological and psychiatric needs. She believes that every contact with the criminal justice system leaves a mark. Fighting to minimise the impact on young clients is particularly important; their experience of the criminal justice system can determine their future. Laura’s clients have taught her to understand their experience and perspective.
Laura trained in a small, close-knit and very busy firm in Hackney, focusing on criminal and benefit fraud cases. She moved to Hodge Jones & Allen Solicitors to work in the criminal defence team that contributes so much to the firm’s excellent reputation.
- “Laura O’Brien has provided brilliant services in all stages. Laura was really attentive, helpful, professional and gave me plenty of advice. She was highly supportive and very active in assuring that the case was dealt with efficiently.”
- “Brilliant service. The instructed solicitor was very nice, calm and polite. I would recommend Hodge Jones & Allen to everyone!”
- “Thank you for the help, advice and guidance and for the friendly professional service from your Solicitor [Laura] who handled my case. I was extremely distressed having never had to deal with this type of legal matter however I felt reassured after I met your colleague.I would feel comfortable recommending you to others and using your firm in the future for any type of legal service needed.”
- Murder – R v S – representing a man charged with the murder and arson following the death of his estranged wife.
- Child abduction – R v P – represented woman acquitted of child abduction after taking someone else’s child to another country without permission of her lawful guardian.
- Murder – R v D – represented a young adult who was first on a multi-handed indictment for murder and possession of a bladed article.
- Attempted murder – R v I – represented man charged with attempted murder in relation to a stabbing that left the young complainant with a knife lodged in his eye-socket.
- Conspiracy to rob – R v A – representing a youth facing a charge of conspiracy to rob in a multi-handed case in the Crown Court.
- Exposure – R v D – acted as Crown Court advocate for a man suffering complex psychological problems including obsessive compulsive disorder. He was found not fit to plead and following a trial of issue was found not to have done the ‘act’ alleged. This required a careful application of the law surrounding what comprised the ‘actus reus’ and what the prosecution had to prove.
- Sexual assault – R v H – represented a captain facing Court martial in relation to an alleged sexual assault on a fellow officer.
- Conspiracy to supply – R v H – represented the only defendant to be acquitted following a lengthy trial lasting a number of months.
- GBH – R v D – acted as Crown Court advocate for a man charged with stabbing a long-time friend.
- Arson reckless as to whether life would be endangered – R v B – represented a young vulnerable woman accused of setting a fire at a halls of residence.
- Rape – R v R – man acquitted of raping his girlfriend following targeted disclosure requests that supported the client’s defence and undermined the account given by his girlfriend. Successfully defended the same client in the Magistrates Court accused of breaching a non-molestation order after careful cross-examination of the complainant in relation to her phone records.
- Assault on police – R v C – acted as Crown Court advocate for a man charged with assaulting a police office. Following careful cross-examination of a number of officers the client was acquitted.
- ABH – R v R – acted as Crown Court advocate for a man charged with assaulting a police officer on the way home from a night out. After careful cross-examination of the complainant he was acquitted.
- GBH – R v D – represented a 15-year old boy charged with stabbing another school boy on the street. After a successful application to exclude hearsay evidence no evidence was offered and a not guilty verdict was recorded.
- Fraud – R v M – social worker accused of benefit fraud in relation to a failure to declare a workplace pension was acquitted.
- Fraud – R v N – woman accused of benefit fraud acquitted after prosecution forced to offer no evidence.
- Possession with intent to supply cannabis – R v D – represented client at trial acquitted of possession with intent to supply cannabis.
- Assault on police & obstruction of police – R v M & P – represented two clients at trial charged with obstructing and assaulting officers detaining another male for a drugs search. Despite drugs having been found on the male being searched, after a full day of cross-examining police officers, I argued that the Magistrates could not be sure that the officers had been acting in execution of their duties and both clients were acquitted.
- Breach of section 14 condition – R v D, A, H – represented three Extinction Rebellion protestors at trial acquitted of breaching a section 14 condition on assembly. One of many acquittals secured in relation to prosecutions arising from April 2019 Extinction Rebellion protests.
Memberships and Appointments
- Committee member of the Youth Practitioners Association (YPA)
- London Criminal Courts Solicitors’ Association (LCCSA)
- The Solicitors’ Association of Higher Courts Advocates (SAHCA)
Articles & Publications
- Advocacy and the vulnerable training, 2017
- Higher Courts Advocate, 2015
- Duty Solicitor, 2015
- LPC, BPP, 2010-2012
- Law Conversion, BPP, 2010
- BA French and Politics, University of Leeds, 2005-2009
- Associate, Hodge Jones & Allen Solicitors, 2020 – present
- Solicitor, Hodge Jones & Allen, 2019 – 2020
- Solicitor, Moss and Co, 2014-2018
- Trainee, Moss and Co, 2012-2014
- Volunteer Paralegal, Islington Law Centre, 2011-2012