Chloe has great experience in all types of criminal law but specialises in drug, serious violence and sexual offences and working with young and vulnerable people.
She defends clients facing serious offences including murder, rape, possession of drugs with intent to supply and arson. She is particularly adept in complex cases involving technical evidence. She is a regular advocate in the Magistrates Court and an experienced trial advocate. She has a long history of dealing with niche areas such as protest and human rights cases.
Chloe often acts on behalf of vulnerable clients, whether by way of their age or mental health. She is respectful and sensitive to their needs and is able to explain complex ideas in a way that is understood.
- “Chloe Hartnell took on my case and I’m very happy with the service she provided. She was attentive and professional at all times, kept me informed on any progress and very reliable. I would highly recommend.”
- R v DA 2019 – Successfully acted for a vulnerable client found in possession of 1 kg of cocaine and accused of having it with intent to supply. The case involved forensic examination of tens of thousands of pages of phone evidence.
- R v KM 2019 – Successfully acted for a client accused of rape and stalking. The defendant did not speak English and the allegation spanned over twenty years. There were thousands of pages of evidence said to show bad character of the defendant in multiple languages and child witnesses. The defendant was acquitted of all charges after a lengthy trial.
- R v SM 2019 – Successfully acted for a man accused of threatening to blow up a petrol station. She conducted the trial involving several witnesses and much CCTV footage.
- R v SC 2017 – acted for client said to be part of largest cannabis cultivation conspiracy worth £26 million.
- R v JF 2014 – represented and acted as advocate for a protestor who demonstrated outside the Royal Courts of Justice about Mark Duggen’s death, caused by the police. She was acquitted.
- R v AST– represented a man accused of attempted murder after someone was shot point bank to the temple. He was acquitted.
- Fagan and Fergus v. The United Kingdom- 347/13 – Communicated Case  ECHR 322 – challenge of the UK courts allowing evidence to be given by anonymous witnesses in an allegation of kidnapping, false imprisonment and blackmail.
- R (Fergus) v Southampton Crown Court  EWHC 3273 and R (M) v Inner London Crown Court  EWCA 2497 (Admin) – successfully challenging Crown Court Judges’ unreasonable decision to withdraw bail for my clients by way of Judicial Review.
- R. v. Taylor  1 CR App. R. 37, – acted for a man asserting the Rastafari right to consume cannabis under the Human Rights Act.
- College of Law PSC 2001-2002
- The London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) LLB 1997-2000
- Senior Associate Solicitor, Hodge Jones & Allen Solicitors– May 2020 to date
- Associate Solicitor, Hodge Jones & Allen Solicitors – February 2019 to 2020
- Member, Amphlett Lissimore Bagshaws LLP – 2012 – 2019
- Partner Hartnells solicitor 2009 – 2012
- Solicitor, Hartnells solicitor 2004 -2009