Road Traffic Accident compensation claim

Personal Injury case report: Court awards client of Hodge Jones & Allen over £3 million damages for personal injury

The Claimant in this case, Mr Dixon suffered severe personal injuries in a road traffic accident which occurred on 5th July 1997.

At the time of the accident the Claimant was 21 years of age and a student at Newcastle University. The accident occurred during the summer holiday in the early hours of a Saturday morning when the Claimant and five other friends went for a drive. The Defendant was the driver and the Claimant was a passenger.

Tragically, the car collided with a tree and two passengers were killed. The Defendant was subsequently convicted of causing death by dangerous driving and was sentenced to a period of imprisonment.

The Defendant's insurers admitted liability at the outset. The only issue was the Claimant's own contributory negligence. In the event, the parties agreed that a deduction of 27.5% was appropriate in this regard, and the court approved that deduction.

The Claimant suffered a severe traumatic brain injury in the accident, a complex severe fracture and dislocation of the left hip and in addition to the surgery involved the Claimant has a result scarring, foot-drop and a permanent limp. He also suffered a complex fracture of the right side of the pelvis, facial injuries including a fractured left jaw, mandible and cheek bone, chest injuries requiring a tracheotomy and subsequent revision surgery for the tracheotomy scar. The Claimant remained in hospital until discharge home a little over four months later.

Between May and October 2003 he was admitted as an inpatient to a specialist brain injury rehabilitation unit. The Claimant's main psychiatric problem arising from his traumatic brain injury is a bipolar mood disorder or hypomania.

The assessment of damages took place in the High Court in July 2004 before the Honourable Justice Gross. One of the key issues surrounded the claim for future loss of earnings. The Claimant succeeded in his claim that he would have had a successful career in the financial sector. The Court also considered whether the Claimant should be compensated to reflect the loss of a chance he had to achieve very high earnings but decided that this element was speculative and did not make any award for that.

The Claimant was awarded the cost of past and future care and case management. The court preferred the evidence of the Claimant's experts on this issue.

The Claimant was awarded:

  • Pain suffering and loss of amenity £ 147,500
  • interest thereon to the date of trial of £ 11,800
  • Past losses to the date of trial £ 345,000
  • Interest £ 75,478
  • Future surgery, physiotherapy and prescriptions £ 67,652
  • Future loss of earnings and car allowance £ 905,121
  • Future loss of insurance policies £ 15,500
  • Future loss of pension £ 207,184
  • Future costs of Court of Protection and Receiver £ 169,344
  • Future care and case management costs £2,238,578
  • Total amount of damages for past
  • and future losses £4,183,157
  • After deduction for contributory negligence of 27.5% the Claimant was awarded £3,032,279.
Hodge Jones & Allen
27th October 2004

Get in touch

Call now for a confidential, no obligation discussion


> 0800 437 0080

> CALL ME BACK

> ONLINE ENQUIRY

Legal News

What we do

Testimonials

"HJA feedback: Olivia Lawson kept us... fully informed... a real asset ... expert advice ... lovely manner."
More testimonials
"Personal injury: Peter Todd is... the most fantastic solicitor you could have... Thank you so much."
More testimonials
"Crime: Caroline Collins conducted herself in a very professional manner ... an asset to your company..."
More testimonials