Mulcahy v Ministry of Defence - 1996
Military Claims case report: Mulcahy v Ministry of Defence
(1996)
The claimant in this case was a serving
soldier deployed in Saudi Arabia during the first Gulf
War. His unit was operating long-range artillery, firing
shells at targets in neighbouring Iraq. The Claimant alleged
that his injury had been caused by the negligence of the gun
command during the live-firing of rounds. The Claimant was
ordered by his commanding officer to fetch water stored at the
front of the gun. As the Claimant was in front of the gun his
commanding officer ordered it to fire. The force of the weapon
firing threw the Claimant to the ground, causing him to suffer
serious injuries in the process.
In this case the Court of Appeal held, in
striking out the claimant’s claim, that Mulcahy had been in a war
zone taking part in warlike operations, and that as a soldier in
these circumstances did not owe a fellow soldier a duty of care
when engaging the enemy in battle conditions in the course of
hostilities, the claimant did not have a cause of action against
the Ministry of Defence. This was therefore a case where the
Court felt that there was a sufficient link between the act of
negligence and the military context within which the accident
occurred (Mulcahy’s unit were actively attacking the enemy when the
accident occurred).