Widow awarded damages after egg allergy death

Widow awarded damages after egg allergy death04 Mar 2010

A widow has been awarded damages after it was ruled that the negligence of a caterer effectively caused her husband's death.

Kuldip Singh Bhamra and his wife Amarjit Bhamra were Sikhs and had travelled from Birmingham to a wedding at a Sikh temple in London in 2003.

Although Mr Bhamra knew he had a serious allergy to eggs, he assumed he was safe in eating all the foods at the wedding because eggs are banned under the religion.

However, Prem Dubb of Lucky Caterers had underestimated the number of guests that would attend the wedding and quickly ordered in some more of a dish called ras malai from an outside source.

Nobody checked that it did not contain egg and it is thought that this is where Mr Bhamra ate some of the animal-derived product.

The victim, who had forgotten to pick up his epi-pen, went into a coma and died three days later in hospital.

Ms Bhamra took legal action against the caterer, claiming that it should have made sure all the foods at the wedding did not contain banned foods.

Now, Lord Justice Moore-Bick has agreed that Mr Bhamra could have reasonably expected to be safe in eating the food at a Sikh wedding and agreed that Lucky Caterers should pay his widow GBP 415,000 in compensation.

According to Bupa, egg allergies are most common in children under the age of one, but they can occasionally carry on into adult life.
ADNFCR-1554-ID-19651263-ADNFCR

Get in touch

Get in touch

0800 437 0080 Call for a confidential, no obligation discussion


> CALL ME BACK

> ONLINE ENQUIRIES

What we do

Testimonials

"HJA feedback: Olivia Lawson kept us... fully informed... a real asset ... expert advice ... lovely manner."
More testimonials
"Personal injury: Peter Todd is... the most fantastic solicitor you could have... Thank you so much."
More testimonials
"Crime: Caroline Collins conducted herself in a very professional manner ... an asset to your company..."
More testimonials